In this piece, we’ll be comparing the top two medical software solutions in the market for you. Keep reading till the end if you’re interested!
Cerner EHR Software
Cerner’s PowerChart Outpatient EHR is a hybrid EHR designed for doctors working in clinics and other ambulatory settings. PowerChart is a tool for creating multi-entity electronic medical records. This system may be hosted on-premises or in the cloud. It comes with a number of built-in templates that encompass a variety of specializations, making it useful for a wide spectrum of medical professionals.
Cerner software helps office personnel handle patient records procedures while also providing flexible documentation choices, allowing them to coordinate treatment across various locations and practitioners. The solution’s collection of clinical data templates, customizable procedural workflows, and patient record options represent these alternatives. Cerner EMR is ONC-ATCB approved and meets the requirements of Meaningful Use Stages 1 and 2. Its patient portal aids office communication by providing appointment reminders and allowing patients to see their medical data online.
PowerChart Touch is also provided for healthcare practitioners that need to use tablets and other devices to access mobile processes. Cerner electronic medical records provide customer service by phone, FAQs, and the Cerner client site. Other than that, all of the other Cerner Medical software features are great. Although there has been a lot of Cerner vs Epic Comparisons, in this piece, we are going to talk about Cerner vs Athena in terms of features and costs so let’s get started!
athenahealth is an award-winning EMR, practice management, and client engagement product partnered with world-class offerings that remove most of the back-office organizational tasks for practices and organizations that want to ensure top-quality healthcare and a superior patient encounter while enhancing financial outcomes. Data-driven analytics from the greatest system in medical distinguish Athena’s solutions, and since they are cloud-based, these insights, as well as product upgrades, are given regularly to assist all clients to achieve new heights of productivity, effectiveness, and profitability.
Athena health EMR gives practises and organisations of all levels the tools they need to flourish in today’s fast-paced environment. Smart UI, incredibly simple EHR; great customer support; straightforward pricing; authorisation management; and so on are some of the key aspects and perks. athenahealth Gamify enables employees to work better by incorporating gaming elements into ordinary work. The goal is to offer credit to workers when their performance levels improve, which maintains them on top and inspires them to work more.
Athena health EMR promises proactive trend analysis and customised benchmarking. athenahealth Consumers may use EMR to gain valuable insights that help them better serve their customers. It is built on cutting-edge technology, an open and interconnected environment, and professional support.
Athenahealth EHR vs Cerner EHR
In terms of:
Both Cerner and athenahealth EMR Software include significant patient engagement options, such as a client portal that allows clients to communicate with their providers without interruption. Easy online payments can also be made using the patient portal system. Clinical recording software aids clinicians in speeding up the charting procedure.
The cost of EHR system is significant, thus medical offices set aside funds to acquire the software system. A single practitioner may spend $163,765 on a sophisticated and efficient software solution. It includes charges for modification and implementation, as well as hardware, maintenance, and training. Both Cerner and athenahealth do not release price information to the public; however, pricing can be obtained upon request. Customers can contact both software suppliers for further information.
However, as per research, Cerner EHR pricing starts at $25 and Athenahealth EHR pricing starts at $149. But, we would still recommend you get in touch with the vendor for better pricing information.
One of the most important components of any EHR software system is integration and interoperability. Details and client information may be freely transmitted thanks to interoperability, which improves care coordination. EBSCO Nursing Resources, CHADIS, Enterprise Software, and CHRON Health Telemedicine are all easily integrated with Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory EHR. Pre-built connectors for apps, diagnostic tests, and other health systems are available from Athenahealth. For bespoke integrations, the company also provides an API and other tools.
Cerner’s users have access to specialized and client assistance 24 hours a day, seven days a week, which is a huge plus for medical practices. Their support team is motivated to be helpful and prompt in order to fix any concerns properly. Athenahealth only provides customer service, and only during business hours. On EMRSystems, you can browse genuine customer reviews for both suppliers to have a better understanding.
Which Software Should You Invest in?
Cerner EHR and Athenahealth EHR are both excellent medical software solutions. However, we can not recommend you either since we don’t have the type of practice you’re working in. What you can do instead is schedule a demo with both the software and find out more about the features they have to offer. Look for the features that you think are the most required ones in your practice. Read as many online reviews of both as possible. This will give you an idea of what to expect and what more explore during the demo. Lastly, we would recommend you to figure out your budget and see what fits your pocket the most. Hopefully, these three tips will help you make a more informed decision.
Athenahealth is a solid choice for medical clinics looking for a user-friendly interface and robust reporting capabilities; unfortunately, assistance is only available during business hours. Cerner is an excellent choice for HDOs that demand round-the-clock customer service and want to improve their population health management capabilities. Finally, both providers are great rivals for streamlining processes, and a free sample is encouraged to examine how the software system operates.